On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 07:31:44PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 06:35:32PM +0100, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 05:04:20PM +0100, Diego Biurrun wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2006 at 04:27:47PM +0300, Alexander Polakov wrote:
> > > > * Leonhard Scherer <lyon8_AT_gmx.net> [061122 16:18]:
> > > > >
> > > > > I got very much the same opinion like you, Anselm; but I really miss the
> > > > > togglemax-view feature :/
> > > > >
> > > > > Maximizing to a specific tag is very uncomfortable, I think, so I would
> > > > > really like to have the titlebars removed and the togglemax inserted again.
> > > >
> > > > I have the same opinion and added the togglemax from dwm-0.<something>
> > > > myself, also removed titlebars (just not draw them (thanks Anselm for
> > > > more correct solution, I'll use it now))
> > >
> > > So will togglemax come back due to popular demand? :)
> >
> > No, because it is zoom in floating mode/for floating clients.
>
> That's how it was implemented? Because the behavior is different, some
> windows (notably shells and emacs), don't maximize completely in
> floating mode. Then again, this might be a separate issue...
That's because floating mode respects incremental resizals.
Regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Thu Nov 23 2006 - 09:33:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:32:42 UTC