Re: [dwm] some useful changes

From: Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 17:31:14 +0100

On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 02:17:07PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 11/27/06, Enno Gottox Boland <gottox_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> >I think this change make the whole configuration more weird. I never
> >used more than one function per key.
>
> I agree with the "more weird" part, it makes config.h less intuitive;
> writing a wrapper function really isn't that hard (people who don't
> know enough C to do that, probably will be confused by this
> configuration approach as well). I somehow find this approach to be
> below par compared to the rest of dwm.

What do others think about the change?
Anyone likes the change? If not, I'd consider removing it
again...

Regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
Received on Mon Nov 27 2006 - 17:31:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:32:50 UTC