Re: [dwm] some useful changes

From: Ricardo Lanziano <>
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2006 11:54:37 -0500

* Anselm R. Garbe <> [2006-11-27 17:31:14 +0100]:

> On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 02:17:07PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> > On 11/27/06, Enno Gottox Boland <> wrote:
> > >I think this change make the whole configuration more weird. I never
> > >used more than one function per key.
> >
> > I agree with the "more weird" part, it makes config.h less intuitive;
> > writing a wrapper function really isn't that hard (people who don't
> > know enough C to do that, probably will be confused by this
> > configuration approach as well). I somehow find this approach to be
> > below par compared to the rest of dwm.

dwm configuration is through source code modification and recompilation,
so knowing a bit of C is requiered. I think that its not a feature that
depends on the user for being applied or not, its about making dwm code
smaller, efficient and better.

> What do others think about the change?
> Anyone likes the change? If not, I'd consider removing it
> again...

The change could be useful, just because we arent using more than one
function per key doesnt mean we wouldnt if its implemented.

Ricardo Lanziano                                                         .d$$$$$$b.
1DB1 3F01 E0E5 CB77 A4AC  46C2 9C9A 789B 1431 E275                       $$$$( )$$$b
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are         Q$$$$$$$$$$B
Received on Mon Nov 27 2006 - 17:56:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:32:52 UTC