Re: [dwm] multiple functions per key revised

From: Anselm R. Garbe <>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 17:23:10 +0100

On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 05:09:43PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
> On 12/15/06, Enno Gottox Boland <> wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >WTF? Adding return for saving a few milliseconds and adding an extra
> >layout to make dwm more bloat... I dont think this is a good idea.
> >
> >Imho we should stay where we are. This solution is very clean, doesn't
> >waste loc and has a very small overhead.
> Indeed. It is true that this doubles the average time needed to handle
> a keypress (before the return was removed the average time to handle a
> keypress was the time needed the handle the key in the middle of the
> list, while now all keys take the time of the last one in the list;
> then again, this does make all keyhandling times equal, which probably
> increases predictability for people who can sense the difference
> between 2 and 5 milliseconds :-P), but that's much less of a problem
> to me than messing up config.h. This is simply not something that
> belongs in config.h.


 Anselm R. Garbe >< >< GPG key: 0D73F361
Received on Fri Dec 15 2006 - 17:23:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:33:53 UTC