Re: [dwm] multiple functions per key revised

From: pancake <pancake_AT_youterm.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 18:59:24 +0100 (CET)

Yu.. Just KiSS :)

> On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 05:09:43PM +0100, Sander van Dijk wrote:
>> On 12/15/06, Enno Gottox Boland <gottox_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> >Hi!
>> >
>> >WTF? Adding return for saving a few milliseconds and adding an extra
>> >layout to make dwm more bloat... I dont think this is a good idea.
>> >
>> >Imho we should stay where we are. This solution is very clean, doesn't
>> >waste loc and has a very small overhead.
>>
>> Indeed. It is true that this doubles the average time needed to handle
>> a keypress (before the return was removed the average time to handle a
>> keypress was the time needed the handle the key in the middle of the
>> list, while now all keys take the time of the last one in the list;
>> then again, this does make all keyhandling times equal, which probably
>> increases predictability for people who can sense the difference
>> between 2 and 5 milliseconds :-P), but that's much less of a problem
>> to me than messing up config.h. This is simply not something that
>> belongs in config.h.
>
> ACK
>
> --
> Anselm R. Garbe >< http://suckless.org/~arg/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
>
>
Received on Fri Dec 15 2006 - 18:59:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:33:54 UTC