Re: [dwm] incremental stack patch

From: Enno \ <gottox_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:00:23 +0100

Hi!

hmm... the Idea is not bad. But I think the usage of floating point is
ugly. How about using the same method as used with MASTER. simething
like
bla * 750 / 1000.

Gottox

2007/1/11, y i y u s <yiyu.jgl_AT_gmail.com>:
> another one from stupid patchs (tm). i wrote this one as an exercise,
> curiosity...
> It changes the behaviour of the stack and now it is incremental: you
> define in config.h INCSTACK 0.75 and the second stack window height
> will be the 75% of the first one, the third window the 75% of the
> second one, etc.
> It complicates the source (it was so clean!...) and adds the math.h
> dependency. OTOH, it doesn't really mean a great improvement: if
> INCSTACK is near to 1 you don't feel any difference, and if it is near
> to 0 you can't have too many clients in the stack.
> I plan to release a mousemode patch against dwm 3.0, but the
> incremental stack patch will be unmaintained. I just wanted to send it
> to the list because somebody could think it would be useful.
>
> cu at #dwm
>
> --
>
>
> - yiyus || JGL .
>
>
>

-- 
http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro
http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)
Received on Fri Jan 12 2007 - 08:00:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:34:37 UTC