Re: [dwm] 2wm-0.1 <- it must have been a nightmare

On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 04:43:35PM +0100, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
> Tako rzecze Anselm R. Garbe (w e-mailu datowanym 2007-02-12, 16:38):
>
> > Honestly, I think what I implemented is a nightmare ;)
> > I now realize how important and well the floating/tiling mode
> > toggle feels (and that it's not client-based in dwm).
> >
> > So returning to dwm. Tomrrow 3.5 will appear btw.
>
> Gosh, arg, I was truly afraid you'll get in love with your stereowm and
> drop dwm's development.
>
> Glad you like these features too.

Actually it was a very easy task, and I think the 2wm code is a
nice testbed for experimental ideas, but I'm convinced already
that dwm includes the right decisions and that this stereo
approach sucks.... even if one rarely uses the tagging
capabilities - I frequently missed in the 2-4 hours I went with
2wm the possibility to join 1+3 (dev+www)...

Regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361