Re: [dwm] tagging vs stereo

It saddens me to hear that -- I've been using 2wm for a little bit now
and I absolutely love it. I can see for someone with a ton of clients
it would suck, but I tend to just have a browser an a terminal
running. I have screen on always, with a ton of terminals in it, but
it's still just in one xterm instance.

I'm going to stick with 2wm for a while, and if you ever get round to
implementing sbar, that'll be icing on the cake. :)

Kurt

On 2/12/07, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 09:56:54AM -0600, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> > I love the idea of stereowm. I keep five tags, but lately I've only
> > used two, and in a similar manner: there's the web browser, and the
> > terminal. I generally only have one terminal open, because that's
> > what screen is for.
>
> Did you tried 2wm? I really tried it, and it sucks in my eyes,
> see on your own ;)
>
> > My one suggestion? Don't make sbar take up any screen real estate.
> > Also don't make it a managed window. Since it does nothing but read
> > from stdin, I'd like to see it transient. That is, I'd like to see it
> > show up when I hit, say, Alt+F1, and then disappear when I release the
> > keybinding.
>
> I'm not sure anymore if I'm really going to implement sbar,
> there are more important things todo. 2wm was just an experiment
> ;)
>
> Regards,
> --
> Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
>
>

-- 
// Kurt H Maier