Re: [dwm] Re: master size for each tag patch

On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 04:16:00PM +0100, Marek Bernat wrote:
> On 2/14/07, Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org> wrote:
> >
> >I got an idea: Don't do it, don't do it now ;)
> >Stick with dwm as is.
> >
>
> Hm, dwm, as it is now, isn't sufficient for me and my browser + dictionary
> usecase.
> I suppose quick hack will do for now
> (that is, set specific master size when dictionary and browser tags are
> viewed),
> but I am sure there is a way to make this more clean and general.
>
> And anyway, now that I started to think about this, I am quite surprised
> that everyone is content with only one master size for everything. It just
> doesn't make sense. Or does every one have such a big screen that they don't
> care?

I usually stick to the master default (I rarely use Mod1-{g,s}).
But my resolution is huge:

  http://www.suckless.org/shots/dwm-20070214.png

Maybe instead of viewing the clients you want in a join view,
check if it suffices tagging the dictionary client with more
tags by default (you can use "1|2|3" - the OR in rule
definitions for instance), e.g.

 { "Firefox", "3|4|6", False }

Regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361