Re: [dwm] 9ubuntu?

Yeah, I remembered about larch straight after I sent the email.. I
didn't know it could create install cds as well though. I'm sure that
would be a great plus.

On 3/14/07, Stalwart <stlwrt_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> There's toolkit released for making Arch live/install cds - it's called larch
>
>
> On 3/14/07, Callan Barrett <wizzomafizzo_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > As much as I like Debian/Ubuntu I'd second Arch as well. It provides
> > all the tools required for compilation as a base, it would take a few
> > minutes to create some sort of suckless-tools dummy package, has a
> > simple and fairly vanilla configuration base and it has every
> > application you've listed to be installed by default in its
> > repositories. The only thing I see taking a while is a new
> > livecd/install cd, but it couldn't be any harder than creating a new
> > Ubuntu one.
> >
> > On 3/14/07, Stalwart <stlwrt_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Slackware (and its forks), Crux (and its forks including ArchLinux)
> > > and source-based distros (gentoo, smgl) rule because they're simple
> > > (well, except gentoo). Debian is too automated and has (imho) too much
> > > strange scripts. ArchLinux minimal install is ~100Mb, but full
> > > dwm-environment can be <250Mb. Same with slack
> > >
> > >
> > > On 3/14/07, Michael Muster <a-chopper_AT_gmx.de> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > I, don't see a reason why it is necessary to start a new distribution.
> > > > If you install a minimal debian by selecting nothing when tasksel
> > > > asks, you get a minimal system where everyone can install what he/she
> > > > wants.
> > > > For an minimal dwm-system an
> > > > aptitude install x-window-system-core and a few
> > > > x-libs to compile dwm should work.
> > > > Perhaps add build-essential, xterm, and an editor and the system is
> > > > ready for use.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Callan Barrett
> >
> >
>
>

-- 
Callan Barrett