Re: Re: [dwm] st: a few questions from a 9term user

I confirm urxvt is extremely fast ;)
I tested st, but it looks a bit buggy... does anyone use it ?
still looking for the perfect terminal, but for now urxvt is the
best/fast/powerfull...
FYI I use a fc6 urxvt rpm.

Would be interested to know what terminal everyone's using...

Lobzang.

On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 10:20 +0200, Alexandru E. Ungur wrote:

> >>> sender: "Stalwart" date: "Sat, Mar 17, 2007 at 01:10:08AM +0200" <<<EOQ
> > <1 sec on all computers i tried it. Check your hardware, maybe you
> > have problems with APIC (usual on new laptops)
> I'll second that. Urxvt is bloody fast here too:
>
> ~>> time urxvt -e exit
>
> real 0m0.043s
> user 0m0.009s
> sys 0m0.010s
> ~>> time urxvt -e exit
>
> real 0m0.042s
> user 0m0.011s
> sys 0m0.007s
> ~>> time urxvt -e exit
>
> real 0m0.045s
> user 0m0.007s
> sys 0m0.012s
> ~>> time urxvt -e exit
>
> real 0m0.043s
> user 0m0.007s
> sys 0m0.008s
> ~>> time urxvt -e exit
>
> real 0m0.043s
> user 0m0.009s
> sys 0m0.008s
>
> and so on, and this is without urxvtd. Of course I compiled a really slim version ;-)
> with just the bare minimum I need:
>
> ~>> urxvt -h
> rxvt-unicode (urxvt) v8.2 - released: 2007-02-12
> options: styles,encodings=eu+vn,selectionscrolling,wheel,smart-resize,scrollbars=NONE
>
>
> Cheers,
> Alex
>

Lobzang
___________________
http://lobzang.free.fr
Received on Wed Mar 21 2007 - 15:02:12 UTC