Re: [dwm] Bottom Stack patch for dwm-4.1

Anselm R. Garbe --> dwm (2007-05-24 11:01:19 +0200):
> Hi Ross,
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:42:46PM -0400, Ross Mohn wrote:
> > I've posted a new patch that works, but I don't think that the vanilla
> > dwm code deals with all the cases that might need the remainder
> > solution. For example, if nmaster>1, you might want to apply a remainder
> > to the bottom window, but it would be different from the tiling
> > remainder. How correct are we trying to get with it? Is it worth
> > accounting for both these remainder possibilities?
>
> That's indeed an issue. So the question is, wether we revert the
> algorithm to not handling any remainder or to handle it properly
> for both, master and stack windows.
>
> What do others think? I think it might be worth to make it work
> properly for any case, even if the algorithm gets a little bit
> more complex, just for accuracy and aesthetical reasons.

++go_for_accuracy ;-)

-- 
bashian roulette:
$ ((RANDOM%6)) || rm -rf ~