Re: [dwm] Fwd: [hackers] separated layout-specific stuff...

Imho, this should be included into 4.4
2007/8/11, Jeremy O'Brien <obrien654j_AT_gmail.com>:
> On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 06:20:02PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 03:11:11PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
> > > Jeroen Schot <schot-dwm_AT_a-eskwadraat.nl> wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 07:52:46AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> > > > > Two #include lines make a file "ugly"? How so?
> > > >
> > > > It's not about the number of lines, it's about the concept. When I add a
> > > > layout (say 'gridmode') it will look:
> > > >
> > > > #include "tile.h"
> > > > #include "float.h"
> > > > #include "gridmode.h"
> > > > #define LAYOUTS \
> > > > static Layout layout[] = { \
> > > > /* symbol function */ \
> > > > { "[]=", tile }, /* first entry is default */ \
> > > > { "><>", floating }, \
> > > > { "[#]", gridmode }, \
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > Looks pretty redundant/useless to me, which I find ugly :)
> > >
> > > I think that looks clear ... but there is redundance, yes.
> >
> > Yes there is redundance, but I think it is not worse than
> > before. Besides this, I can't think of a sane way how to build
> > up the layout list otherwise... So I think let's live with it.
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
> >
> Personally, I find the redundancy a small price to pay for the newfound
> ease of adding new layouts.
>
> --
> Jeremy O'Brien aka neutral_insomniac GPG key: 0xB1140FDB
> http://pohl.ececs.uc.edu/~jeremy/jeremy.asc Linux ambelina 2.6.22.1 ppc
> 7447A, altivec supported PowerBook5,8 GNU/Linux
>
>

-- 
http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro
http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)