On 9/20/07, Sylvain Bertrand <sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> 2007/9/20, Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz_AT_gmail.com>:
> > On 9/20/07, Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <julien_AT_danjou.info> wrote:
> > > > Hi everybody,
> > > >
> > > > With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to present to you a new project
> > > > called "awesome"[1], a direct neighbour of dwm.
> > > >
> > > > awesome is, yet, another window manager, which is based on dwm
> > > > source code.
> > > > In contrast to dwm, it does not have any limit about its SLOC size.
> > > > Consequently, it already includes some patches or ideas that people
> > > > dropped around in master.
> > > >
> > > > Any feedback will be appreciated, but in order to respect this list
> > > > which is about dwm, please answer to me or to the awesome list[2][3].
> > >
> > > Thanks for the project, I will have a look tomorrow.
> > >
> > > What I miss right now from dwm are:
> > > 1) config file
> > > 2) the old NMASTER feature for vertical tiling
> >
> > Maybe I should try out one of the dwm patches to resurrect NMASTER
> > but I always back down at the thought of having to use an external patch
> > for a long time.
> >
> > <snip>
> >
>
> Maybe industrializing the use of patches in the Makefile would not be
> such a bad idea for such patchable window manager.
I'm using dwm-4.3 for the time being.
Received on Fri Sep 21 2007 - 11:08:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:54:03 UTC