Re: [dwm] Announcing "awesome"

From: Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 11:20:55 +0200

On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 11:08:49AM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> On 9/20/07, Sylvain Bertrand <sylvain.bertrand_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > 2007/9/20, Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz_AT_gmail.com>:
> > > On 9/20/07, Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 9/20/07, Julien Danjou <julien_AT_danjou.info> wrote:
> > > > > Hi everybody,
> > > > >
> > > > > With the approval of Anselm, I'd like to present to you a new project
> > > > > called "awesome"[1], a direct neighbour of dwm.
> > > > >
> > > > > awesome is, yet, another window manager, which is based on dwm
> > > > > source code.
> > > > > In contrast to dwm, it does not have any limit about its SLOC size.
> > > > > Consequently, it already includes some patches or ideas that people
> > > > > dropped around in master.
> > > > >
> > > > > Any feedback will be appreciated, but in order to respect this list
> > > > > which is about dwm, please answer to me or to the awesome list[2][3].
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for the project, I will have a look tomorrow.
> > > >
> > > > What I miss right now from dwm are:
> > > > 1) config file
> > > > 2) the old NMASTER feature for vertical tiling
> > >
> > > Maybe I should try out one of the dwm patches to resurrect NMASTER
> > > but I always back down at the thought of having to use an external patch
> > > for a long time.
> > >
> > > <snip>
> > >
> >
> > Maybe industrializing the use of patches in the Makefile would not be
> > such a bad idea for such patchable window manager.
>
> I'm using dwm-4.3 for the time being.

What is so difficult in porting dwm-4.3 tile() to dwm-4.5?

Regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
Received on Fri Sep 21 2007 - 11:20:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 14:54:04 UTC