Re: [dwm] OT: which or type or what else?

From: Antoni Grzymala <antoni_AT_chopin.edu.pl>
Date: Sat, 8 Dec 2007 21:57:51 +0100

Rickard Gustafsson dixit (2007-12-08, 21:48):

> That's a pretty nasty solution if you ask me. I would have used:
> if [ ! -f `which convert` ]

I'd just:

which convert || exit

Best,

-- 
[a]

application/pgp-signature attachment: Podpis cyfrowy :: Digital signature

Received on Sat Dec 08 2007 - 21:58:00 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: markus schnalke: "Re: [dwm] OT: which or type or what else?"
Previous message: Rickard Gustafsson: "Re: [dwm] OT: which or type or what else?"
In reply to: Rickard Gustafsson: "Re: [dwm] OT: which or type or what else?"
Next in thread: markus schnalke: "Re: [dwm] OT: which or type or what else?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:09:52 UTC