> > You should use "Desktop" instead.
> >
> > The problem is that this rule is ignored ://
>
> I bet the desktop fullscreen window has set the
> override_redirect hint. Check with
> ; xwininfo | grep Redirect
> If that's the case.
pancake_AT_bare:~$ xwininfo
xwininfo: Window id: 0xa0001d "Escritorio"
Absolute upper-left X: 0
Absolute upper-left Y: 736
Relative upper-left X: 0
Relative upper-left Y: 736
Width: 512
Height: 32
Depth: 24
Visual Class: TrueColor
Border width: 0
Class: InputOutput
Colormap: 0x20 (installed)
Bit Gravity State: NorthWestGravity
Window Gravity State: NorthWestGravity
Backing Store State: NotUseful
Save Under State: no
Map State: IsViewable
Override Redirect State: no
Corners: +0+736 -512+736 -512-0 +0-0
-geometry 512x32+0-0
It doesn't :/
> [..]
> > Not only for gnome, but this way we can provide hybrid environment with
> > tiled desktop and menubar and will be compatible with any available desktop
> > environment or menu implementation.
>
> The problem with this is extensive use of EWMH, and I don't want
> to clutter dwm with this. I think Gnome is nothing for dwm
> users. Same with the other environments.
> ;)
>
> If you really want them co-exist, go with Xnest the one or the
> other way, or with two differently concurrently running X
> servers.
Hehe, i just wanted to express my experience with this weird mixture.
I understand that joining both worlds is not a clean design and I
understand your comments.
I find dwm a nice environment for experimentating with usability and
having this mix can make non-tiled users to see how productives are
these environments. But I see this as an experiment.
Just to see how a 'normal' or ignorant user interacts with a computer
with a tiled window manager just observing how they try to manage the
environment. This way it's possible to fix and learn new ways for dwm
and bring some experimental ideas.
I just want to play O:)
--pancake
Received on Fri Dec 21 2007 - 22:14:19 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:13:43 UTC