Re: [dwm] still simplicity or featureitis?

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 11:52:20AM -0400, Jeremy O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:48:49PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> > On 3/13/08, markus schnalke <meillo_AT_marmaro.de> wrote:
> > > With the multihead thing comming up, I realize a lot of new ideas in
> > > different directions. Changes became big again and everything is a
> > > little bit experimental.
> > > Also complexity increased and the code base as well.
> >
> > i consider current tileh and tilev an improvement and more general
> > solution than previous tile
> >
> > also window geom params now allows easy bottomstack, togglebar, etc setup.
> >
> > the floating mode flag in the layout is a bit ugly
> >
> > focus + restack is not optimal but i had the same feeling before
> >
> > monocle has some problems (if floating then every popup window is
> > maximized, if not then it cannot be used as togglemax replacement for
> > floating windows and has other side effects) but it's a useful layout
> >
> > imho current tip is not worse than earlier versions
> >
>
> Personally, I've switched to wmii until dwm reaches a more usable state
> again... The changes are just too much for me to get used to and I feel
> like it has gone in a backwards direction...

Well, this is not true for at least 2 weeks imho.

Kind regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361