Re: [dwm] still simplicity or featureitis?

From: Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2008 17:48:28 +0100

On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 01:48:49PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
> On 3/13/08, markus schnalke <meillo_AT_marmaro.de> wrote:
> > With the multihead thing comming up, I realize a lot of new ideas in
> > different directions. Changes became big again and everything is a
> > little bit experimental.
> > Also complexity increased and the code base as well.
>
> i consider current tileh and tilev an improvement and more general
> solution than previous tile

Me as well.

> the floating mode flag in the layout is a bit ugly

Well, if you have a better proposal for 4.9, let me know.

> focus + restack is not optimal but i had the same feeling before

What's the issue here?

> monocle has some problems (if floating then every popup window is
> maximized, if not then it cannot be used as togglemax replacement for
> floating windows and has other side effects) but it's a useful layout

Well, that's why monocle should be used as a floating layout.

> imho current tip is not worse than earlier versions

Agreed, and that's why I'm going to release dwm-4.8 now.

Kind regards,

-- 
 Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361
Received on Thu Mar 13 2008 - 17:48:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:25:31 UTC