l33tness?! - l33tness sucks.
I think sort | uniq is more unixy and therefor better :)
2008/4/10 Antoni Grzymala <antoni_AT_chopin.edu.pl>:
> Szabolcs Nagy dixit (2008-04-10, 11:02):
>
>
> > actually 'sort | uniq' is not (much) slower
> > (at least i couldn't measure any difference on my linux setup)
>
> Yeah, but it's got a negative l33tness factor and uses up four more
> bytes in writing not mentioning the evil forking :).
>
> --
> [a]
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFH/dw7L69KEesxVYMRAuYbAJ4/xpYKTuKDN7MR4l57BLs2ei9ozgCcDDz2
> XGSPpjd+paOwuW2aA2yO2w4=
> =bOfm
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
-- http://www.gnuffy.org - Real Community Distro http://www.gnuffy.org/index.php/GnuEm - Gnuffy on Ipaq (Codename Peggy)Received on Thu Apr 10 2008 - 11:27:12 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:32:58 UTC