On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 09:33:59PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Antoni Grzymala <antoni_AT_chopin.edu.pl> wrote:
> > Anselm R. Garbe dixit (2008-04-28, 20:06):
> >
> >
> > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 04:32:47PM +0200, Tuncer Ayaz wrote:
> > > > anyway, I took a look at DEFGEOMS and am not sure whether I
> > > > have to fiddle with bh or something else to emulate BarOff.
> > > > what's the correct way?
> > >
> > > DEFGEOM(nobar, 0, -bh, sw, 0, 0, sw, sh, wx, wy, mfact*ww, wh,
> > > mx+mw, wy, ww-mw, wh, wx, wy, ww, wh)
> >
> > LOL.
> >
> > Sorry, I couldn't resist.
>
> Calling the GEOM nobar instead of simple is
> completely optional as far as I understand it.
You can call a geom as you like, but bare in mind that the name
will be a C function, hence it should not collide with any
existing function name (well, you will notice at build time in
this case).
Kind regards,
-- Anselm R. Garbe >< http://www.suckless.org/ >< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Mon Apr 28 2008 - 22:14:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:36:23 UTC