Re: [dwm] sane editors (was: dijkstra quote)

Daniel Bainton <dpb_AT_driftaway.org> wrote:
> 2008/5/12 Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org>:
> > I agree, but still the SLOC is a related indicator if the
> > functionality has been implemented in a decent way at its level.
> > If a file editor (vim) consists of >200.000 SLOC, something is
> > wrong obviously.
>
> So, any volunteers to implement a suckless vim clone? :P

There is `nvi'.
Maybe `ed' is a bit outdated, but `sam' is the visual-`ed'.

So there are sane editors
... which most people just dont want to use.

meillo