"Daniel Bainton" <dpb_AT_driftaway.org> wrote:
> 2008/5/12 Anselm R. Garbe <arg_AT_suckless.org>:
> > I agree, but still the SLOC is a related indicator if the
> > functionality has been implemented in a decent way at its level.
> > If a file editor (vim) consists of >200.000 SLOC, something is
> > wrong obviously.
>
> So, any volunteers to implement a suckless vim clone? :P
Well, there's the traditional vi [1], VIrus [2] or BusyBox vi [3]. But
none of them really sucks less. But wait for st before you rush to
implement a suckless clone.
By the way I prefer reinventing and improving instead of cloning.
> --
> Daniel
Gruß
Matthias-Christian
[1] http://ex-vi.sourceforge.net/
[2] http://www.rocklinux.net/people/ripclaw/projects/software/virus/
[3] http://busybox.net/
Received on Mon May 12 2008 - 16:36:52 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 15:38:48 UTC