Hello,
> We are publishing a software for the masses: we make it available and
> have a website for it, a mailing list, a wiki, and a mercurial
> repository.
> There is nothing elitist about that.
> The fact that we have to modify the source to customise the product is
IMHO, you're staggeringly wrong, good sir.
I think dwm doesn't make *sense* if you can't edit the source and paste
together your favorite layouts/config to create your own personalized
WM. dwm can't ever be a packaged product ready for mass consumption - if
it is, it will be a different window manager, and we'll have to abandon
it and move on. Then a few years later someone will reinvent the wheel
and say "let's finally write a minimalist WM!"
Without a configuration GUI, window decorations, pagers and whizbang,
dwm is irrevocably elitist, and at least I would like it to stay that
way.
Regards,
Mate
Received on Tue Jul 29 2008 - 09:05:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Jul 29 2008 - 09:12:04 UTC