On 9/7/08, Nicolas Martyanoff <khaelin_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> I think it's quite explicit: the NULL macro expands to 0.
NULL macro does not necessaryly expands to 0, but this is basic
knowledge look it up in the standard.
what am i concerned about is the internal null pointer representation
(which has nothing to do wether NULL is defined 0 or not)
it is explicitely stated in c99 that there might be architectures
where memset(&p, 0, sizeof(p)) is not equivalent to p=0;
Received on Sun Sep 07 2008 - 11:53:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Sep 07 2008 - 12:00:07 UTC