Re: [dwm] dwm-5.2 / dmenu-3.9

From: Yoshi Rokuko <yoshi.rokuko_AT_yokuts.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 23:02:36 +0200

Am Tue, 9 Sep 2008 16:05:19 -0400
schrieb James Turner <james_AT_bsdgroup.org>:

> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 08:58:47PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > I'm glad to announce dwm-5.2 and dmenu-3.9. You can download the new
> > releases from:
> >
> > http://code.suckless.org/dl/dwm/dwm-5.2.tar.gz
> > http://code.suckless.org/dl/tools/dmenu-3.9.tar.gz
> >
> > Both releases contain various bug fixes and code polishings.
> >
> > Many thanks go to all geeks who have been involved in the
> > development during the last weeks.
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > --Anselm
>
> As always, another kick ass release. You can also get the latest
> bottom stack patch from the patches wiki entry [0].
>
> [0] http://www.suckless.org/dwm/patches/bottom_stack.html

so nice and so fast - thanks to all ;-)

i was just wondering why the patch does something like this:

static Layout layouts[] = {
        /* symbol arrange function */
        { "[]=", tile }, /* first entry is default */
        { "><>", NULL },
        { "TTT", bstack },
        { "[M]", monocle },
};

but nothing like that:

{ MODKEY, XK_t, setlayout, {.v = &layouts[0]} },
{ MODKEY, XK_f, setlayout, {.v = &layouts[1]} },
{ MODKEY, XK_s, setlayout, {.v = &layouts[2]} },
{ MODKEY, XK_m, setlayout, {.v = &layouts[3]} },

well MODKEY+b is used, so i took MODKEY+s but that shouldn't be the
point?

best regards,
y0shi

-- 
psyc://nemesis.psyc.biz/~y0shi
http://psyc.biz/y0shi_public.key

Received on Tue Sep 09 2008 - 21:02:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 09 2008 - 21:12:03 UTC