Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

2008/12/13 henry atting <nspm_01_AT_literaturlatenight.de>:
>> 2008/12/13 henry atting <nspm_01_AT_literaturlatenight.de>:
>> The tagging approach didn't change between 5.2 and 5.4, so I assume
>> it's just a matter of making the 5.2 patch applying to the 5.4
>> codebase.
>
> Mmh, I am not very familiar with patching, I did it this way:
>
> ,----
> | do! patch -p1 < dwm-5.2-arrownav.diff
> | missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
> | can't find file to patch at input line 3
> | Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
> | The text leading up to this was:
> | --------------------------
> | |--- config.def.h Tue Sep 9 15:46:17 2008
> | |+++ config.def.h Tue Nov 18 19:26:53 2008
> | --------------------------
> | File to patch: config.def.h
> | patching file config.def.h
> | Hunk #1 succeeded at 62 (offset 1 line).
> | missing header for unified diff at line 14 of patch
> | can't find file to patch at input line 14
> | Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
> | The text leading up to this was:
> | --------------------------
> | |--- dwm.c Tue Sep 9 15:46:17 2008
> | |+++ dwm.c Tue Nov 18 19:31:55 2008
> | --------------------------
> | File to patch: dwm.c
> | patching file dwm.c
> | Hunk #1 succeeded at 197 (offset -1 lines).
> | Hunk #2 FAILED at 1668.
> | 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file dwm.c.rej
> `----

Well as I said, you will need to patch it manually, since the lines
have changed and the heuristic approach supported by patch(1) isn't
succeeding either.

Kind regards,
--Anselm
Received on Sat Dec 13 2008 - 16:54:41 UTC