Re: [dwm] Re: dwm-5.4 stdin; cycle tags

Zitat - Anselm R Garbe * Sa Dez 13 2008 um 17:54 -

> 2008/12/13 henry atting <nspm_01_AT_literaturlatenight.de>:
>>> 2008/12/13 henry atting <nspm_01_AT_literaturlatenight.de>:
>>> The tagging approach didn't change between 5.2 and 5.4, so I assume
>>> it's just a matter of making the 5.2 patch applying to the 5.4
>>> codebase.
>>
>> Mmh, I am not very familiar with patching, I did it this way:
>>
>> ,----
>> | do! patch -p1 < dwm-5.2-arrownav.diff
>> | missing header for unified diff at line 3 of patch
>> | can't find file to patch at input line 3
>> | Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>> | The text leading up to this was:
>> | --------------------------
>> | |--- config.def.h Tue Sep 9 15:46:17 2008
>> | |+++ config.def.h Tue Nov 18 19:26:53 2008
>> | --------------------------
>> | File to patch: config.def.h
>> | patching file config.def.h
>> | Hunk #1 succeeded at 62 (offset 1 line).
>> | missing header for unified diff at line 14 of patch
>> | can't find file to patch at input line 14
>> | Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
>> | The text leading up to this was:
>> | --------------------------
>> | |--- dwm.c Tue Sep 9 15:46:17 2008
>> | |+++ dwm.c Tue Nov 18 19:31:55 2008
>> | --------------------------
>> | File to patch: dwm.c
>> | patching file dwm.c
>> | Hunk #1 succeeded at 197 (offset -1 lines).
>> | Hunk #2 FAILED at 1668.
>> | 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file dwm.c.rej
>> `----
>
> Well as I said, you will need to patch it manually, since the lines
> have changed and the heuristic approach supported by patch(1) isn't
> succeeding either.
>
> Kind regards,
> --Anselm

I see, great thanks
henry
Received on Sat Dec 13 2008 - 17:09:11 UTC