Re: [dwm] Issues with border

I agree too. The shimmy going from a one-client tag to a multi-client tag
and back again is very distracting.

Jeremy

On Thu 19 Feb 2009 - 02:57PM, Premysl Hruby wrote:
> On (19/02/09 13:34), Anselm R Garbe wrote:
> > To: dwm mail list <dwm_AT_suckless.org>
> > From: Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com>
> > Subject: [dwm] Issues with border
> > Reply-To: dwm mail list <dwm_AT_suckless.org>
> > List-Id: dwm mail list <dwm.suckless.org>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if only 1 tiled client
> > is in the view, reasons:
> >
> > - gained screen real eastate is very minimal
> > - configure events are increased by n at any view() and toggleview(),
> > if n is the number of clients in the view
> > - corner cases for togglefloating()
> > - I dislike adjustborder() altogether
> >
> > So my proposal is: reverting to old behavior (nonoborder), and for
> > those who like it, use a config.h function like:
> >
> > void toggleborder(const Arg *arg) {
> > borderpx = 1 - borderpx;
> > arrange();
> > }
> >
> > And then define a key binding for it.
> >
> > Opinions?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > --Anselm
> >
>
> I'm pro too, as I really dislike the noborder.
>
> -Ph
>
> --
> Premysl "Anydot" Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/
>
Received on Thu Feb 19 2009 - 15:09:15 UTC