Re: [dwm] Issues with border

From: Jake Todd <jaketodd422_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:57:01 -0500

On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:53:41 +0100
Antoni Grzymala <antoni_AT_chopin.edu.pl> wrote:

> Anselm R Garbe dixit (2009-02-19, 13:34):
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if only 1 tiled client
> > is in the view, reasons:
> >
> > - gained screen real eastate is very minimal
> > - configure events are increased by n at any view() and
> > toggleview(), if n is the number of clients in the view
> > - corner cases for togglefloating()
> > - I dislike adjustborder() altogether
> >
> > So my proposal is: reverting to old behavior (nonoborder), and for
> > those who like it, use a config.h function like:
> >
> > void toggleborder(const Arg *arg) {
> > borderpx = 1 - borderpx;
> > arrange();
> > }
> >
> > And then define a key binding for it.
> >
> > Opinions?
>
> Agreed. Seems more consistent and elegant. Still, perhaps we can
> rethink the concept of some visual indication if there's more than
> one client in monocle (some kind sould posted a patch showing
> [<client>/<total>] next to the tag bar in monocle mode, perhaps this
> (or something similar) could be integrated right into the monocle
> indicator).
>
> Best,
>

There's already a patch for that. It's in the patches section of the
wiki.

-- 
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS d- s+:+ a--- C++ UL--- P+ L++
E--- W++ N+ o-- K--- w--  O- M V-
PS++ PE-- Y+ PGP+++ t- 5- X R tv+
b+++ DI+ D++ G e+++ h-- r y+ 
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Received on Thu Feb 19 2009 - 15:57:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Thu Feb 19 2009 - 16:00:05 UTC