Re: [dwm] dwm's future

From: bill lam <cbill.lam_AT_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2009 08:20:03 +0800

On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Christian Garbs wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 09:37:56PM +0200, yy wrote:
>
> > I don't think nobody needs unicode glyphs in their tag names or tile
> > symbols, you wouldn't need cairo in dwm
>
> I'm still using dwm-4.7 (because I did not yet have time to port all
> patches to the current version), but Unicode glyphs in status bar
> work, even without pango or cairo. I have German umlauts as well as
> Japanese characters (eg. web page titles from Firefox).

I can display unicode chinese in dwm 5.xx using x11 unicode font (not
xft) without patch. It doesn't matter if those fonts are a little
ugly compared to xft fonts. So I don't think cairo is needed.

-- 
regards,
====================================================
GPG key 1024D/4434BAB3 2008-08-24
gpg --keyserver subkeys.pgp.net --recv-keys 4434BAB3
唐詩146 李益  喜見外弟又言別
    十年離亂後  長大一相逢  問姓驚初見  稱名憶舊容
    別來滄海事  語罷暮天鐘  明日巴陵道  秋山又幾重
Received on Sun Apr 26 2009 - 00:20:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Apr 26 2009 - 00:24:04 UTC