On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:47:33PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:35:20AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
>
> That's mainly proprietary software. dwm shouldn't support that kind of
> software, but instead expose their bare brokenness to the user. Maybe users
> will realise then that proprietary software is not worth using, because you
> can't even fix trivial bugs like this.
Except some of us don't have a choice and have to use this for their
work or at uni...
> Regards,
> Matthias-Christian
Regards,
Valentin
Received on Mon Apr 27 2009 - 18:50:49 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Apr 27 2009 - 19:00:05 UTC