Re: [dwm] dwm's future

From: Jimmy Tang <>
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:58:33 +0100

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:47:33PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> That's mainly proprietary software. dwm shouldn't support that kind of
> software, but instead expose their bare brokenness to the user. Maybe users
> will realise then that proprietary software is not worth using, because you
> can't even fix trivial bugs like this.

i wouldn't say no to supporting such software tbh, there are some
commercial/propietry software where there is just has no opensource
equivalent too that would give the same amount of productivity. it
should be at least considered. some people have no choice but to use
such programs.


Sent from my Nokia mobile phone

Received on Mon Apr 27 2009 - 21:58:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Apr 27 2009 - 22:36:08 UTC