Re: [dwm] nanox

From: carmen <__AT_whats-your.name>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 21:57:49 -0400

On Tue May 19, 2009 at 08:39:56PM -0400, Jacob Todd wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:08:07PM +0200, pancake wrote:
> > ....
>
> Seems interesting, but instead of reinventing the wheel, why don't we just clean
> up X.org and submit patches back upstream? Rewriting/implementing X.org seems li
> ke more work than it's worth, but cleaning up Xorg would be better for everyone.

besides firefox everything i use is curses/term based. with -nolisten and -notcp and hosts.deny and Xforwarding disabled in sshd.conf eveyrwhere (typical stock configs) never use network features either..
Received on Wed May 20 2009 - 01:57:49 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 20 2009 - 02:12:04 UTC