Hi,
2009/5/20 Szabolcs Nagy <nszabolcs_AT_gmail.com>:
> On 5/20/09, Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
>> Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@,
>> and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and wmii@. Those who
>> are only interested in dwm@ or wmii@ specifically could just stay on
>> dwm@ resp. wmii@. That should be technically possible.
>
> dwm, wmii -> hackers
> hackers -> dwm, wmii
>
> so one sends a mail to dwm@ then it goes to hackers@ then someone
> replies there and the reply goes to wmii@?
>
> imho if we merge then don't keep separate dwm and wmii lists
>
> if there are too many commits then commit messages may be separated
> from discussions
Well, let's have one list then as you propose and see how we get on. I
like to see the commits side by side. Because so far there were nearly
0 discussions regarding commits, but we had plenty on dwm@ about
patches.
Still, the traffic won't go up like hell.
Kind regards,
Anselm
Received on Wed May 20 2009 - 09:27:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed May 20 2009 - 09:36:08 UTC