Re: [dwm] Re: New mailing list

On (20/05/09 11:34), yy wrote:
> To: dwm mail list <dwm_AT_suckless.org>
> From: yy <yiyu.jgl_AT_gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [dwm] Re: New mailing list
> Reply-To: dwm mail list <dwm_AT_suckless.org>
> List-Id: dwm mail list <dwm.suckless.org>
>
> 2009/5/20 Szabolcs Nagy <nszabolcs_AT_gmail.com>:
> > On 5/20/09, Anselm R Garbe <garbeam_AT_gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@,
> >> and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and wmii@. Those who
> >> are only interested in dwm@ or wmii@ specifically could just stay on
> >> dwm@ resp. wmii@. That should be technically possible.
> >
> > dwm, wmii -> hackers
> > hackers -> dwm, wmii
> >
> > so one sends a mail to dwm@ then it goes to hackers@ then someone
> > replies there and the reply goes to wmii@?
> >
>
> Maybe I'm being naive, mailing lists are not my strong point. But IMO
> you can send the messages to the people subscribed to hackers with the
> corresponding FROM: field (dwm or wmii). So, if one sends a mail to
> dwm, you recive it as coming from dwm. Since hackers subscribed recive
> mail from both lists, the reply will arrive to dwm and hackers
> subscribers. Only if you specifically send an email to hackers it will
> be received by both lists (and you could, for example, change the TO:
> field when the discussion goes off-topic). Maybe somebody knows if I'm
> right or absolutely wrong.
>
> --
> - yiyus || JGL .
>

Well, or you can just simply post to both dwm@ and wmii@ :) (for
example, both in to: of email). Whole this discussion is all but not
suckless :)

-- 
Premysl "Anydot" Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/
-
I'm a signature virus. Please add me to your signature and help me spread!