On Fri, 18 Apr 2014 11:43:19 +0100
sin <sin_AT_2f30.org> wrote:
> Matter of taste and makes it a bit more explicit to me that
> argv is an array of pointers to chars (and I can treat them as such).
>
> Generally if it was char **p, then depending on the situation p++ might
> have been invalid, where as char *p[] you would probably expect that
> you can access p[0], p[1] up to a certain number of them.
Well, that's a point!
Thanks for clearing that up.
Maybe we should land a patch on the big bases (ubase, sbase) to make
this uniform.
Cheers
FRIGN
--
FRIGN <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Fri Apr 18 2014 - 12:46:00 CEST