Re: [hackers] [sent] [PATCH 2/2] replace farbfeld with libnetpbm

From: Markus Teich <markus.teich_AT_stusta.mhn.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2015 01:30:52 +0100

FRIGN wrote:
> __You need a library to handle it__ and it's not that much of a popular format
> to justify installing a library for it.

Heyho,

like FRIGN pointed out correctly this patch would negate the effort and goal of
the switch to farbfeld. sent with farbfeld uses a separate process instead of
linking to a library and is therefore more UNIXy and sucks less. The patch won't
be merged.

--Markus
Received on Fri Dec 11 2015 - 01:30:52 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Fri Dec 11 2015 - 01:36:15 CET