On Fri, 28 Oct 2016 22:56:14 +0200
Klemens Nanni <kl3_AT_posteo.org> wrote:
Hey Klemens,
> arg.h is really ugly code and way to complex for tools like slock that
> have such minimal synopsis.
it's a bit of "macro magic", but not really that complex if you think
about it. Also, the usage within the code is dead simple and
straightforward.
> Regardless of that, usage() does not have to be a function of it's own
> if it's called just once.
Well, what's the problem with it being a standalone function?
> This (hopefully) is the final commit implementing proper command-line
> pargsing adhering to the POSIX Utility Syntax Guidelines[0] after
> submitting two incomplete patches to the hackers_AT_suckless mailinglist.
Just out of interest, what exactly is arg.h not adhering to with regard
to these POSIX Utility Syntax Guidelines?
> 0:http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/basedefs/V1_chap12.html#tag_12_02
Cheers
Laslo
--
Laslo Hunhold <dev_AT_frign.de>
Received on Sat Oct 29 2016 - 20:39:07 CEST