Re: [hackers] [sbase] [PATCH] parsemode: No need to return after eprintf

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Laslo Hunhold <dev_AT_frign.de>
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2016 13:34:16 +0100

On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 23:27:59 -0800
Michael Forney <mforney_AT_mforney.org> wrote:

Hey Michael,

> Also, since parsemode exits on failure, don't bother checking return
> value in xinstall (this would never trigger anyway because mode_t can
> be unsigned).

very nice! I think the legacy bit us there. I applied the patch.

Cheers

Laslo

-- 
Laslo Hunhold <dev_AT_frign.de>

Received on Tue Dec 27 2016 - 13:34:16 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Laslo Hunhold: "Re: [hackers] [sbase] [PATCH] xinstall: Fix broken memmove with -t"
Previous message: Laslo Hunhold: "Re: [hackers] [sbase] [patch] ed: Treat addresses of 0 as 1 for insert"
In reply to: Michael Forney: "[hackers] [sbase] [PATCH] parsemode: No need to return after eprintf"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Dec 27 2016 - 15:15:33 CET