Re: [hackers] [slstatus] Rewrite Makefile to accomodate file split || Laslo Hunhold

From: Laslo Hunhold <>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2017 21:49:27 +0200

On Sun, 17 Sep 2017 20:36:42 +0100
Matthew Parnell <> wrote:

Hey Matthew,

> Is it really necessary to explicitly list all of these? The other
> rules already cover them implicitly;
> removing them should be fine, and I got a successful compile and run
> without them.

yes, the compile will not fail, but they are needed for dependency
resolution. And the only portable way sadly is to list each one
explicitly, given suffix rules don't allow the listing of prerequisites.

With best regards

Laslo Hunhold

Laslo Hunhold <>
Received on Sun Sep 17 2017 - 21:49:27 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Sep 17 2017 - 22:00:23 CEST