Re: [hackers] Polybar status support

From: Greg Reagle <greg.reagle_AT_umbc.edu>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 09:09:49 -0400

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019, at 06:26, Abdullah wrote:
> I can use bash for that. But don't you think it will use more resources? Previously I had been using such scripts for
> polybar modules and they were using much resources.

Bash is not a lightweight shell; it is a shell with a lot of features. I would *speculate* that writing in something like rc [1] or ksh [2] [3] would use less RAM.

[1] https://tools.suckless.org/9base/
[2] http://www.kornshell.com/
[3] http://mirbsd.de/mksh
Received on Thu Oct 03 2019 - 15:09:49 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Oct 03 2019 - 15:12:24 CEST