Re: [hackers] Polybar status support

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Abdullah <abdullah_AT_abdullah.today>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 18:22:37 +0500

I would write something, but something in dwm.c should be modified to give polybar some space.

On 03-Oct-2019 6:09 PM, Greg Reagle <greg.reagle_AT_umbc.edu> wrote:

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019, at 06:26, Abdullah wrote:
> I can use bash for that. But don't you think it will use more resources? Previously I had been using such scripts for
> polybar modules and they were using much resources.

Bash is not a lightweight shell; it is a shell with a lot of features. I would *speculate* that writing in something like rc [1] or ksh [2] [3] would use less RAM.

[1] https://tools.suckless.org/9base/
[2] http://www.kornshell.com/
[3] http://mirbsd.de/mksh

Received on Thu Oct 03 2019 - 15:22:37 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Oct 03 2019 - 15:24:25 CEST