Re: [hackers] Polybar status support

From: Abdullah <>
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2019 18:22:37 +0500
I would write something, but something in dwm.c should be modified to give polybar some space. 

On 03-Oct-2019 6:09 PM, Greg Reagle <> wrote:

On Thu, Oct 3, 2019, at 06:26, Abdullah wrote:
> I can use bash for that. But don't you think it will use more resources?  Previously I had been using such scripts for
> polybar modules and they were using much resources.

Bash is not a lightweight shell; it is a shell with a lot of features.  I would *speculate* that writing in something like rc [1] or ksh [2] [3] would use less RAM.


Received on Thu Oct 03 2019 - 15:22:37 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Oct 03 2019 - 15:24:25 CEST