Re: [hackers] [PATCH 1/2] Use *at functions with appropriate flags instead of lstat/lchown

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Laslo Hunhold <dev_AT_frign.de>
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2019 16:51:13 +0100

On Sun, 22 Dec 2019 17:03:58 -0800
Michael Forney <mforney_AT_mforney.org> wrote:

Dear Michael,

>

really impressive work! The recurse-backend is probably one of the most
complicated parts of sbase, so kudos for daring to refactor it so
nicely!
What is the performance effect of this patch on big directories? It
should be noticeable, shouldn't it?

With best regards

Laslo

application/pgp-signature attachment: OpenPGP digital signature

Received on Mon Dec 23 2019 - 16:51:13 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Quentin Rameau: "Re: [hackers] [dwm][PATCH] cleanup, saves 7 LOC"
Previous message: Devin J. Pohly: "Re: [hackers] [dwm][PATCH] cleanup, saves 7 LOC"
In reply to: Michael Forney: "[hackers] [PATCH 1/2] Use *at functions with appropriate flags instead of lstat/lchown"
Next in thread: Michael Forney: "Re: [hackers] [PATCH 1/2] Use *at functions with appropriate flags instead of lstat/lchown"
Reply: Michael Forney: "Re: [hackers] [PATCH 1/2] Use *at functions with appropriate flags instead of lstat/lchown"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Dec 23 2019 - 17:00:22 CET