Re: [hackers] [quark][PATCH] Fix buffer over-read in decode()

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Laslo Hunhold <dev_AT_frign.de>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 20:23:34 +0100

On Sun, 21 Aug 2022 20:09:16 +0000
HushBugger <hushbugger_AT_posteo.net> wrote:

> On Wed, 2022-08-17 at 08:49 +0600, NRK wrote:
> > I think the `s++` should be removed from the for loop and `s` should
> > be incremented as needed inside the loop instead.
>
> Agreed. I've changed it.

Thank you for working out this patch, I have applied it! :)
Received on Sun Feb 26 2023 - 20:23:34 CET

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: fossy_AT_dnmx.org: "Re: [hackers] [quark][PATCH] Fix buffer over-read in decode()"
Previous message: mohrizq895_AT_gmail.com: "[hackers] [dmenu][PATCH] this patch allows dmenu to grab the the keyboard output (raw user input text) and then displays/prints , this is useful in case of adding new field to a list of major bookmarks fields for example. This behaviour exists in rofi using the command (rofi -dmenu )."
In reply to: HushBugger: "Re: [hackers] [quark][PATCH] Fix buffer over-read in decode()"
Next in thread: fossy_AT_dnmx.org: "Re: [hackers] [quark][PATCH] Fix buffer over-read in decode()"
Reply: fossy_AT_dnmx.org: "Re: [hackers] [quark][PATCH] Fix buffer over-read in decode()"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun Feb 26 2023 - 20:24:40 CET