Re: [wmii] Question about column layout

ext Anselm R. Garbe wrote:

>To me, there is no (major) difference in having several tabbed
>clients in one page, or each client on a different page - in
>both cases you only see the client/page you selected per time -
>not the others.
>
>
For example lets say that there are a clients A, B, C and D. I would
associated them as follows:
(A,(B,C))
(A,D)
By association I mean that I would like to see the clients in the list
at the same time in an optimal fashion (each having about as much space
as possible). Since A should be visible at the same time with the pair
(B,C) as well as with D, I would need either to have A present in both
pages occupied by (B,C) and D or (B,C) and D are in the same tab. Take a
pick. Either will do for me.

>On the other hand, we plan to integrate tagbars and extended
>stacking features, which fully replace the pros of tabs with a
>nearly equivalent functionality, but without adding an
>additional layer, just only using the trick, that you might
>think of vertical tabs (which are tagbars representing a hidden
>client) instead of horizontal ones.
>
>
>
Sounds fine.

Jani
Received on Tue Jan 24 2006 - 14:38:55 UTC