Re: [wmii] Question about column layout

On 1/24/06, Jani H. Lahtinen <jani.h.lahtinen_AT_nokia.com> wrote:
> ext Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
>
> >To me, there is no (major) difference in having several tabbed
> >clients in one page, or each client on a different page - in
> >both cases you only see the client/page you selected per time -
> >not the others.
> >
> For example lets say that there are a clients A, B, C and D. I would
> associated them as follows:
> (A,(B,C))
> (A,D)
> By association I mean that I would like to see the clients in the list
> at the same time in an optimal fashion (each having about as much space
> as possible). Since A should be visible at the same time with the pair
> (B,C) as well as with D, I would need either to have A present in both
> pages occupied by (B,C) and D or (B,C) and D are in the same tab. Take a
> pick. Either will do for me.
>
> >On the other hand, we plan to integrate tagbars and extended
> >stacking features, which fully replace the pros of tabs with a
> >nearly equivalent functionality, but without adding an
> >additional layer, just only using the trick, that you might
> >think of vertical tabs (which are tagbars representing a hidden
> >client) instead of horizontal ones.
> >
> Sounds fine.

+1. I use very often tabs and have rather many tabs open than many
pages. It would be very nice if you could keep this functionality (or
at least, give an ersatz, such as these "tagbars" for instance). Thx
Received on Tue Jan 24 2006 - 19:04:40 UTC