On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 06:29:26PM +0200, Stefan Tibus wrote:
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 05:51:34PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> > What about simply combining 'swap' and 'move' into one action
> > (which could be still called swap)? Such an action creates
> > columns on the attempt to swap with a non-existent column at
> > boundaries. E.g. if only 1 columns exists with 2 clients, a swap
> > east would create a new column and move the focused client
> > there.
> So swap to non-existing column would be a move and swap to
> existing columns a swap. You still need an explicit move between
> existing columns then... Or did I misunderstand "combining"?
The idea is that there is no explicit move between columns - but
it might be bad, dunno.
-- Anselm R. Garbe ><>< www.ebrag.de ><>< GPG key: 0D73F361Received on Thu May 04 2006 - 18:51:38 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:04:14 UTC