On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 05:51:34PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> What about simply combining 'swap' and 'move' into one action
> (which could be still called swap)? Such an action creates
> columns on the attempt to swap with a non-existent column at
> boundaries. E.g. if only 1 columns exists with 2 clients, a swap
> east would create a new column and move the focused client
> there.
So swap to non-existing column would be a move and swap to
existing columns a swap. You still need an explicit move between
existing columns then... Or did I misunderstand "combining"?
Regards,
Stefan
Received on Thu May 04 2006 - 18:30:00 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:04:14 UTC