On Thu, 4 May 2006 20:17:01 +0300
"Alexandru E. Ungur" <alexandru_AT_globalterrasoft.ro> wrote:
> > The idea is that there is no explicit move between columns - but
> > it might be bad, dunno.
> Yep, it might introduce more complexity instead of reducing it...
> If swap is swap and move is move all is clear, but if swap is move or
> swap depending on the context... it may be less typing (less shortcuts)
> but it also will be more thinking before making a move...
> Not good. Right now I don't have to think :D and I'd like to keep
> it that way... ;)
On the other hand, the current scheme makes me think a lot and distracts me much from the work I'm doing, As I swap and move a lot while working (what I think is »dynamic«), and having to think whether I have to swap or to move now really makes my little head hurt.
Greetings,
Denis
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Jul 13 2008 - 16:04:15 UTC